Skip to main content Skip to navigation
Washington State University
College of Education

What Is News?

Sharing your great work

What you do is surely awesome! It’s your livelihood and you’re an expert in your field.

And now you’ve done something good, maybe even great.

Is it news? Well… maybe!
(How is that for toeing the line?)

What is “news?”

There’s no good way to define what news is. That’s because news is defined so differently by so many different entities, groups or organizations, for so many different groups of people. Communication schools, organizations, and think tanks all over the country still fight about this very issue.

Is news simply what people want to see or hear or read? Or should media have the ability (or responsibility) to tell people what the news is?

But, we can certainly try to determine something’s newsworthiness based on generally accepted criteria.

News criteria

There are always variations of what should be covered as news. In general, these are criteria often used:

  • The first part of “news” is “new.” Is this potential story new?
  • Is it unusual?
  • Is it interesting or significant?
  • Is it about people?

Obviously, the more of these that apply, the better chance something will be considered news.

Is it new?

The first three letters of “news” is “new.”

If it is not new, it’s not news.

If a professor is simply in the middle of research, it’s not going to make the front page (or any page) of The Daily Evergreen, let alone the New York Times. Why not? Because it’s not new.

However, if some new facts about the research become known for the first time, then there’s a component that is now new.

Note: Events which occur days, weeks, or months before can still possibly be considered news if they haven’t been reported before, because for those listeners or viewers, it is new.

A common example is that the death of Mao Tse-tung. The Chinese government held onto the news for several days. When they finally released the information, it was news.

Is it unusual?

If our dean wakes up, goes for a walk, goes to work, works, goes home, and catches a Gonzaga basketball game on TV while doing some more work, then it’s not news, because it’s what may happen on any given day.

Just because something happens and it’s new doesn’t mean it’s news. Usually, ordinary stuff isn’t news.

A professor just published an article in a journal. Not unusual.

Another common example: “Dog bites man” is not news; “Man bites dog” is news.

Is it interesting?

Events can be new and unusual, but might not be of interest to the general public. However, it might be interesting to a select group of individuals with similar areas of expertise.

In a peer-reviewed journal about kinesiology, something about athletic training might be interesting. The same news might not be as interesting in a counseling psychology publication.

Is it significant?

Therefore what? That’s the question that needs to be answered about any potential news story. You have something that is new, unique, interesting. But if there’s nothing that changes or progresses, then it might not be significant.

What’s the effect?

Is it about people (or animals)?

A fire burns down an apartment complex. Why do people connect with this story? It’s usually because they’re actually connecting with the people it affects. If the first was in the middle of nowhere, didn’t harm anything, and was quickly put out, there’d be little chance anyone would care because there’s no human element.

A journalist who is a good storyteller will always ask how something affects her readers, viewers or listeners’ lives or livelihoods.

A mudslide in small Oso, Washington was a story, not because of the mudslide itself, but because of the devastating effect on the people in that town.

Oh, and animals are like people. If Fido is affected by something, it will have the same effect on the viewer.

Our own editorial decision-making

The College of Education Marketing/Communications team will try and maximize the publicity on your news story if:

  1. It fits within our mission and vision, and;
  2. The team has the person capacity to make it happen, and;
  3. We have editorial space, and;
  4. We think that it will gain attention.

So, about No. 3… every newspaper has a finite amount of print space. Every TV station or radio station has a finite amount of time. So, as an example, when a TV news station is making their daily rundown, they first come up with a news budget, then talk about all options when deciding on placement.

We must also make editorial decisions based on the amount of space we have on the front of our website, on blogs, in videos, etc. We must also make decisions that take into account the various programs and the various locations. We can’t do story after story about Kinesiology (FYI, this hasn’t been a problem unfortunately). We can’t only do stories coming out of the Tri-Cities (also hasn’t been a problem). When Marketing/Communications does its “news budget,” meaning all the stories you’ve told us about, or which we’ve heard about from other sources, we still must break it down into what can be handled and where it goes.

WSU Insider stories

The WSU Insider will write about many things, but the news bureau folks have started to have, as a policy, a desire to only share things that they believe will be picked up by media. Additionally, their data show that research stories outperform all others in terms of web hits and shares. And, it’s not even close. Media are interested in good research. They aren’t so much interested in a small award that someone won, no matter how much we think they’re wrong or how much it hurts our feelings.

For the WSU News folks to consider a research story, the story, with limited exceptions, must meet one of three prongs:

  1. A new grant. They prefer grants with high dollar amounts and big awarding institutions. I’ve worked with them to understand that while we DO have those things from time to time, if we don’t get some leeway, we’ll get lost. Those conversations are starting to yield positive results.
  2. A conference where the research is being presented. This could be a keynote address, a workshop being led, etc.
  3. Newly published research results. Obviously, they like the big publications that draw a lot of attention in the science world. Just like my comments in No. 1, I’ve worked with them to understand that our research has major societal implications. Don’t tell me that the work Kristin Huggins is doing doesn’t matter just because it doesn’t include a petri dish and a pipette!

If there is ongoing research, but it’s not being presented at a conference, for example, then the WSU Insider does not want to publish it. Not only does it take time to write (us… sometimes them) and edit (they always look things over and modify), they don’t want to have research that falls within one of those three prongs get lost among the stories that don’t fall under one of those prongs.

It’s all about target audience

For our purposes, we aren’t so concerned about what news is to us, because it’s ALL news if it’s the latest with what’s going on in your world!, right ;)? Rather, we’re concerned with what someone else says it is if we’re trying to get into their newspaper, blog, radio news, TV news, editorial, etc.

In other words, your story might be news to WSU News but not to the New York Times (according to those organizations). Or it might be news to a small pocket of our alumni but not to the greater WSU community (again, according to those organizations).

Additionally, it’s not just whether a news organization thinks it’s news, but if it thinks it’s news for their audience. If we have a great kinesiology story regarding everyday exercise routines for indivuals in their 60s and beyond, we would have a lot more traction trying to pitch the story to Reader’s Digest than we would trying to pitch the story to Maxim.


Story Jurisdiction

A few things about our award stories and who is in charge.

You ever watch crime dramas and see two different agencies fighting over whose case it is, based on jurisdiction?

This isn’t a whole lot different than the considerations we have to make with on-campus news and stepping on each other’s feet.

A few examples:

  • Great (hypothetical) news: The Office of the Provost gives its annual distinguished faculty award to Yong Chae Rhee (congrats)! We get excited and want to put out a release.
  • Jurisdiction: It may be great news. But, as this is the provost’s award to give out, it’s also the provost’s office who has the right to put out a release announcing its winner. In these cases, we still will ask the provost’s communications team if they have any planned release. If they don’t, we request the right to do it. In most cases, these requests are granted.
  • Great news: Four faculty members from three different colleges win a prestigious research award. They win in different categories, but they all win. One of the winners is our faculty member.
  • Jurisdiction: If we send something in to WSU News, they will tell us that they don’t want to do separate stories for the different colleges. So they pick either an entity on campus that deals with all of them, or they have someone from WSU News itself do the article. Here’s a real-life example from 2016: https://news.wsu.edu/2016/05/26/three-wsu-advisors-receive-international-awards/. Notice how the Office of Undergraduate Education ended up doing the story about three advisors winning awards? Yes, one of our advisors was only that list, but so were two folks from other colleges. So, WSU News requested that a specific writer do a wrap-up.

Does my story have a chance?

So, tell us what’s going on. We can assess and see if there’s an avenue that might be worth exploring, even if it’s our own website.

Submit Potential Story

With this form, we’ll try to lead you through this in a way that can maximize our abilities to see the great work you’re doing as a “news” story.